The Curse of Knowledge - by Grant Kearney


WE ALL SUFFER from the curse of knowledge, although most of us don't know it.

Like many afflictions,the curse of knowledge can manifest itself in a variety of forms and is one of the most insidious and challenging of all barriers to our capacity to collaborate and innovate.

When we know something, it is difficult for us to imagine not knowing it or to understand why others also don't know it. As a result, we often find it hard to communicate and collaborate effectively with others. Equally, it is often difficult for us accept that there are things that we think we know that in fact we don't know.

The unstoppable emergence of the knowledge economy is driven by the speed with which the three core ingredients of economic growth can now move around the globe. Today skills, capital and knowledge can be shuffled from one country or market to another with lightninglike speed. We only have to witness the fallout of the global financial crisis, the emergence of the BRIC economies and convergence of areas such as ICT and transport or health and food to begin to realise the implications for us all.

It was only a few years ago that we were being urged to "innovate or die", but the global marketplace has changed so much so quickly that to survive in today's environment we must have the ability to collaborate successfully across organisations, sectors and borders. Any individual, company or economy that believes it can do it all by themselves is doomed for natural extinction. There is a need for speed and a sense of urgency for Australia to build an open, productive, sustainable and competitive economy through developing our capacity to innovate collaboratively. In the words of Jeffrey Immelt, chairman and CEO of GE, "We are all just a moment away from commodity hell."

I believe the emergence of this new environment for innovation (where constant reinvention and collaboration is a simple imperative) demands a new definition of innovation itself. Almost every government, industry association and academic report we read tends to use a variation of what I regard as an 'industrial or manufacturing age' definition. It is usually described as "doing something new or different to add economic or social value".

I commend to you a new definition of innovation for these new times of the knowledge economy: "Innovation is the novel application of shared knowledge to add economic or social value". The point is that while innovation is actionbased delivering practical economic or social value, it is fundamentally collaborative. It generally requires shared knowledge and/or capabilities, most likely to be multidisciplinary and often sourced externally. Individually, we are capable of being creative and inventive but it is through collaboration that we innovate.

In striving to build an open, productive and competitive economy in the context of the emergence of the global knowledge economy and our response to it as a nation, we must be alert to the curse of knowledge and the dangers it presents. It would seem to me that there are broadly two extremes of those of us afflicted with the curse: those who are 'blissfully ignorant' and those who 'know it all', and then of course there are those in between.

While ignorance may be bliss to most of us from time to time, there is no doubt it is also a major barrier to our capacity to collaborate and innovate. Locking ourselves away in silos and ignoring the rest of the world around us is one sure fire way to catch the curse of knowledge; we have all come across companies and other organisations that are so insulated from the rest of the world that they are almost dysfunctional within the context of the modern knowledge economy.

These 'blissfully ignorant' organisations and their staff are simply incapable of capturing external opportunities through collaboration. They are unable to look outside their current sphere, to see opportunities that may exist across sectors and boundaries. A small university spin-out that IXC has worked with was focussed on providing its enzyme technology to the mining sector. IXC discovered a multinational food company seeking an enzyme solution for a product and introduced the two organisations. This relationship brought the spin-out a new source of revenue and provided the food company with a solution that did not jeopardise its IP.

No particular type of organisation or individual is immune to the blissfully ignorant strain of the curse of knowledge. It can be found strangling the growth potential of major multi-nationals along with well-known Australian companies and can be particularly contagious within public sector organisations. Third sector groups and charities are not immune and, of course, there is more than one entrepreneurial type who has 'blissfully' re-invented the wheel.
Aware of these risks, the managing director of a leading Australian manufacturer commissioned IXC to carry out a three-month review and analysis of external policies, market trends and emerging technologies that could affect its future. With this type of leadership, it is no wonder the company is highly profitable and much loved by the markets.

At the other end of the scale is the 'know-it-all'. We think we know so much about the subject at hand that it is almost impossible for us to understand that others don't share this knowledge. We assume that because something is so obvious to us it is inconceivable that others don't share the same knowledge. It is a no-brainer to me and "you just don't get it!" In many ways this is an especially destructive and particularly wasteful barrier to collaborative innovation.

One of most common areas where the know-it-all form of the curse of knowledge is to be found is among the entrepreneur, start-up and SME communities. Experience the tragedy often described as 'founders syndrome' where a completely viable new enterprise with much commercial or social promise is torn apart, often with great personal and financial consequences for the collaborators involved, because the inventor, creator or founder simply cannot accept that others can't see things the way they do. It can sometimes be a case of my way or the highway.

Another all too common waste is all the great ideas that never make it to social or commercial application because the 'ideators' think that the idea in itself is so important and obvious that others will get it eventually. Here the curse of knowledge can be a major barrier to collaboration between research, academia and industry.

Then there are know-it-all organisations and individuals that are simply conceited about the depth or breadth of their knowledge and capabilities and believe that they already know or have access to all the knowledge they need to innovate. This group has no idea "that they don't know what they don't know" and tend to see collaboration as being something to be done on their terms only.

This attitude can often be found in larger companies with strong research and development budgets and in well-funded public research institutes. Not only do they miss out on valuable collaborative opportunities for new business growth but they run the very real risk of being blindsided by what they don't know. To avoid this predicament, a large international manufacturer approached IXC to find a technical solution to a problem with a new product it couldn't solve itself. IXC introduced them to an Australian university whose research could be applied to the problem. This willingness to look outside the company saved them valuable product and market development time.

To protect ourselves as a nation from the curse of knowledge we must commitment ourselves to three equally important courses of action. We must improve the capacity of our business managers to collaborate. We must educate our workforce from the days of early schooling on the important dimensions of human relations, including respect for the knowledge and ideas of others and the value of sharing knowledge with each other. And we must build a national collaborative platform that integrates the use of both people and technology for connectivity.

There is a need and an opportunity for our policy makers and education leaders to encourage the development of management courses and training programs for business men and women that focus on collaborative innovation. Organisations, such as the Society for Knowledge Economics, the Australian Business Foundation, Innovation & Business Skills Australia and others, are making promising progress in this direction and I have long promoted the need for an Australian Institute for Collaboration.

Traditionally, young people have not been formally taught the importance of human relations as part of preparing for work life. Yes, we were all encouraged by our parents and teachers to share our lollies, to play nicely and to respect others but this has generally been within a societal context and not as a formal part of preparing people for the workplace. When it comes to thinking about work and careers, young people are still more likely to be encouraged to be competitive rather than collaborative.

There is a compelling need to develop school-based pre-university courses in human relations that prepare our workforce for a world where collaboration is based on the application of shared knowledge. There should be no reason why young people can't study the impact of human relations on their potential for a successful career while also studying economics.

It is equally important that as a nation we build the internal and external connectivity that is needed for businesses and the workforce to be competitive. This requires more than simply leveraging or connecting the myriad of research, education, industry support and innovation programs that already exist or the creation of some new web portal or database.

In order to build a national collaborative platform to drive both our productivity and our international competitiveness we need to combine the power of technology and people with new processes and systems for 'on demand' access to knowledge and capabilities. This will require new thinking and cultural change on the part of government, research and business as we seek out how to quickly and safely access, move and share knowledge across traditional legal, organisational and national barriers.

Source:

Total Executive

http://www.TotalExec.com.au/te-tips/

Supporting Executives and their staff with daily quotes and tips

 

Currently complimentary membership to Total Executive is available for 2010/2011 Saving $495:00.

Learn about Leadership Sustainability Responsibility Technology Communication Creativity Coaching Training and Education from our Network of executives & leaders

Visit: http://www.totalexec.com.au/membership-benefits/

Could urine be the way forward for transportation?

New Products and Inventions

Researchers from Ohio University have developed an efficient way to produce hydrogen from urine. The technique could fuel vehicles while cleaning up wastewater from sewage plants.

Producing hydrogen from urine could be done at a fraction of the cost of producing it from water, as the hydrogen atoms are less tightly bound to nitrogen than they are to the oxygen atoms in water, thus taking less energy to break them apart.

However, urea quickly turns into ammonia, and produces emissions which can cause health problems such as chronic bronchitis and asthma attacks...

Source: Idea Connection

Chicken Feathers to Create Cheap Hydrogen Storage

Chicken Feathers may one day compete with more high-tech solutions such as carbon nanotubes for storing hydrogen for fuel-cell-powered vehicles.

Richard Wool's team at the University of Delaware in Newark heated chicken feather fibres to 400 °C without burning. The process resulted in stable, porous carbonised fibres. When cooled to -266 °C, the material could store almost 2 per cent of its weight in hydrogen - almost as much as carbon nanotubes.

Solutions for the Common Good

IdeaConnection is seeking to harness the collective intelligence of the world, and make it available to all. Contribute your social innovations for the good of mankind by posting your solutions and comments. The donation of your time and knowledge is appreciated by everyone using this resource.


Click on a heading to Add your Solution, or [POST A NEW PROBLEM]


Agriculture & Permaculture

Agriculture & Permaculture (36)


Alternative Currencies

Alternative Currencies (1)


Alternative Energy

Alternative Energy (9)


Business & Economics

Business & Economics (48)


Culture & The Arts

Culture & The Arts (1)


Cyber Crime

Cyber Crime (3)


Educational Advancement

Educational Advancement (24)


Emotional & Mental Health

Emotional & Mental Health (11)


Environment & Ecology

Environment & Ecology (58)


Family & Community

Family & Community (1)


Food & Nutrition

Food & Nutrition (6)


Global Climate Change

Global Climate Change (4)


Government & Law

Government & Law (32)


Health, Wellness & Healing

Health, Wellness & Healing (65)


Human & Civil Rights

Human & Civil Rights (75)


Interpersonal Relationships

Interpersonal Relationships (9)


Media & Communications

Media & Communications (2)


Peace, War & Security

Peace, War & Security (45)


Recycling

Recycling (7)


Scientific Advancement

Scientific Advancement (19)


Spirituality & Religion

Spirituality & Religion (2)


Substance Abuse & Treatment

Substance Abuse & Treatment (23)


Sustainable Development

Sustainable Development (10)


Transportation

Transportation (8)


Water Resources

Water Resources (9)

New Products and Inventions

New Method to Reduce Methane

New Method to Reduce Methane

University of Alberta researchers have developed a formula to lessen the methane gas that cattle produce by as much as 25 per cent by balancing starch, sugar, cellulose, ash, fat and other elements of feed.

Methane is a greenhouse gas which accounts for 72 percent of total emissions in Canada. Indentifying these factors in the food allows farmers to lessen the environmental impact of their cattle raising activities.

The study was funded by the Canada Research Chairs program and the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council.

[SCIENCEDAILY.COM]

New Products and Inventions

Molecule That Can Help The Heart Repair Itself

Researchers at UT Southwestern Medical Center have discoverd a protein that can initiate the repair of heart cells and blood vessel growth after a heart attack.

The molecule, Thymosin beta-4, is expressed by embryos during the heart's development and encourages migration of heart cells. Scientitsts have used the molecule experimentally in mice, and it can begin to take action as early as 24 hours after injection. An examination of the capillary smooth muscle cells three days later showed a significant increase in capillary density near the site of the heart attack.

Further studies are needed to determine whether the same success will occur in larger animals.

Wireless Electricity Is Here (Seriously)

I'm standing next to a Croatian-born American genius in a half-empty office in Watertown, Massachusetts, and I'm about to be fried to a crisp. Or I'm about to witness the greatest advance in electrical science in a hundred years. Maybe both.

Either way, all I can think of is my electrician, Billy Sullivan. Sullivan has 11 tattoos and a voice marinated in Jack Daniels. During my recent home renovation, he roared at me when I got too close to his open electrical panel: "I'm the Juice Man!" he shouted. "Stay the hell away from my juice!"

He was right. Only gods mess with electrons. Only a fool would shoot them into the air. And yet, I'm in a conference room with a scientist who is going to let 120 volts fly out of the wall, on purpose.

"Don't worry," says the MIT assistant professor and a 2008 MacArthur genius-grant winner, Marin Soljacic (pronounced SOLE-ya-cheech), who designed the box he's about to turn on. "You will be okay."

We both shift our gaze to an unplugged Toshiba television set sitting 5 feet away on a folding table. He's got to be kidding: There is no power cord attached to it. It's off. Dark. Silent. "You ready?" he asks.

If Soljacic is correct -- if his free-range electrons can power up this untethered TV from across a room -- he will have performed a feat of physics so subtle and so profound it could change the world. It could also make him a billionaire. I hold my breath and cover my crotch. Soljacic flips the switch.

Soljacic isn't the first man to try to power distant electronic devices by sending electrons through the air. He isn't even the first man from the Balkans to try. Most agree that Serbian inventor Nikola Tesla, who went on to father many of the inventions that define the modern electronic era, was the first to let electrons off their leash, in 1890.

Tesla based his wireless electricity idea on a concept known as electromagnetic induction, which was discovered by Michael Faraday in 1831 and holds that electric current flowing through one wire can induce current to flow in another wire, nearby. To illustrate that principle, Tesla built two huge "World Power" towers that would broadcast current into the American air, to be received remotely by electrical devices around the globe.

Few believed it could work. And to be fair to the doubters, it didn't, exactly. When Tesla first switched on his 200-foot-tall, 1,000,000-volt Colorado Springs tower, 130-foot-long bolts of electricity shot out of it, sparks leaped up at the toes of passersby, and the grass around the lab glowed blue. It was too much, too soon.

But strap on your rubber boots; Tesla's dream has come true. After more than 100 years of dashed hopes, several companies are coming to market with technologies that can safely transmit power through the air -- a breakthrough that portends the literal and figurative untethering of our electronic age. Until this development, after all, the phrase "mobile electronics" has been a lie: How portable is your laptop if it has to feed every four hours, like an embryo, through a cord? How mobile is your phone if it shuts down after too long away from a plug? And how flexible is your business if your production area can't shift because you can't move the ceiling lights?

The world is about to be cured of its attachment disorder.

WIRELESS JUICE: A PRIMER

TECH 1: Inductive Coupling
Availability: April

>> THE FIRST WIRELESS POWERING SYSTEM to market is an inductive device, much like the one Tesla saw in his dreams, but a lot smaller. It looks like a mouse pad and can send power through the air, over a distance of up to a few inches. A powered coil inside that pad creates a magnetic field, which as Faraday predicted, induces current to flow through a small secondary coil that's built into any portable device, such as a flashlight, a phone, or a BlackBerry. The electrical current that then flows in that secondary coil charges the device's onboard rechargeable battery. (That iPhone in your pocket has yet to be outfitted with this tiny coil, but, as we'll see, a number of companies are about to introduce products that are.)

The practical benefit of this approach is huge. You can drop any number of devices on the charging pad, and they will recharge -- wirelessly. No more tangle of power cables or jumble of charging stations. What's more, because you are invisible to the magnetic fields created by the system, no electricity will flow into you if you stray between device and pad. Nor are there any exposed "hot" metal connections. And the pads are smart: Their built-in coils are driven by integrated circuits, which know if the device sitting on them is authorized to receive power, or if it needs power at all. So you won't charge your car keys. Or overcharge your flashlight.

The dominant player in this technology for the moment seems to be Michigan-based Fulton Innovation, which unveiled its first set of wirelessly charged consumer products at the Consumer Electronics Show early this year. Come April, Fulton's new pad-based eCoupled system will be available to police, fire-and-rescue, and contractor fleets -- an initial market of as many as 700,000 vehicles annually. The system is being integrated into a truck console designed and produced by Leggett & Platt, a $4.3 billion commercial shelving giant; it allows users to charge anything from a compatible rechargeable flashlight to a PDA. The tools and other devices now in the pipeline at companies such as Bosch, Energizer, and others will look just like their conventional ancestors. Companies such as Philips Electronics, Olympus, and Logitech will create a standard for products, from flashlights to drills to cell phones to TV remotes, by the end of this year.

TECH 2: Radio-frequency Harvesting
Availability: April

>> THE INDUCTION SYSTEMS are only the beginning. Some of the most visually arresting examples of wireless electricity are based on what's known as radio frequency, or RF. While less efficient, they work across distances of up to 85 feet. In these systems, electricity is transformed into radio waves, which are transmitted across a room, then received by so-called power harvesters and translated back into low-voltage direct current. Imagine smoke detectors or clocks that never need their batteries replaced. Sound trivial? Consider: Last November, to save on labor costs, General Motors canceled the regularly scheduled battery replacement in the 562 wall clocks at its Milford Proving Ground headquarters. This technology is already being used by the Department of Defense. This year, it will be available to consumers in the form of a few small appliances and wireless sensors; down the road, it will appear in wireless boxes into which you can toss any and all of your electronics for recharging.

TECH 3: Magnetically Coupled Resonance
Availability: 12-18 months

>> INVENTED BY MIT'S SOLJACIC (who has dubbed it WiTricity), the technique can power an entire room, assuming the room is filled with enabled devices. Though WiTricity uses two coils -- one powered, one not, just like eCoupled's system -- it differs radically in the following way: Soljacic's coils don't have to be close to each other to transfer energy. Instead, they depend on so-called magnetic resonance. Like acoustical resonance, which allows an opera singer to break a glass across the room by vibrating it with the correct frequency of her voice's sound waves, magnetic resonance can launch an energetic response in something far away. In this case, the response is the flow of electricity out of the receiving coil and into the device to which it's connected. The only caveat is that receiving coil must be properly "tuned" to match the powered coil, in the way that plucking a D string on any tuned piano will set all the D strings to vibrating, but leave all other notes still and silent. (This explains why Soljacic considers the machinery that create these frequencies, and the shape of the coils, top secret.)

Importantly, then, WiTricity doesn't depend on line-of-sight. A powered coil in your basement could power the rest of the house, wirelessly. Will the cat be okay? "Biological organisms are invisible to, and unaffected by, a magnetic field," Soljacic says. While I am mulling that statement, he tells me the company will not yet reveal the name of its partners because those partnerships haven't been formalized, but they include major consumer electronics brands and some U.S. defense customers.

As has been the tradition since Nikola Tesla and Thomas Edison angrily parted ways in 1885, the enormous consumer demand for wireless electricity is begetting intense competition. Last November, a consortium of manufacturers coalesced around Fulton's eCoupled system. But Fulton and WiTricity aren't the only companies fighting to bring wireless electricity to market. WiPower, in Altamonte Springs, Florida, has also created an induction system and says it, too, is close to announcing partnerships. And Pittsburgh-based Powercast, an RF system, sells wireless Christmas ornaments and is testing industrial sensors for release this summer.

Just as Tesla derided his doubters as "nothing more than microbes of a nasty disease," some name-calling is inevitable in this increasingly heated battle. WiPower, for example, insists that the eCoupled technology approach has several problems. "Their system is very sensitive to alignment, and I've heard there's a heating issue," says CEO Ryan Tseng. "Our system is more elegant, much less expensive, and easier for manufacturers to integrate." Meanwhile, Powercast calls Dave Baarman, Fulton Innovation's director of advanced technologies, "irresponsible" for wondering aloud whether RF power solutions could be dangerous around pacemakers and powered wheelchairs. "It's competitive drivel," says Steve Day, Powercast's VP of marketing and strategic planning. "Baarman has been saying this for a couple of years, because what we do will eventually replace what he does."

But as I stand, covering myself, in that featureless suburban conference room, such bickering fades to background noise. Because with Tesla's 100-foot-long lightning bolts and blue grass vivid in my mind, I have a big question: Will Soljacic, the MacArthur Foundation fellow, be able to turn on that Toshiba TV from across the room? Or will I be bathed in a magnetic field so intense my molecules all align to face true north?

After he flips the switch, the little television, 5 feet away, springs to life. Wirelessly. The DVD player inside spins up to a low whine. Colors flicker on the moving screen. And Soljacic's eyes dance with the reflected light of the image.

Paul Hochman is the gear and tech editor for Today on NBC and host of MSN.com's GearDaddy.

Source